Ambrose and John Chrysostom

One trend becoming more widespread today in religious history and religious studies generally is what I would call "urban studies." Particular attention is paid to the cities of Christian antiquity and their influence on the Church and theology. Such a focus is at work in a new book that focuses on two of the towering figures of, respectively, Latin and Greek Christianity, Ambrose of Milan and John Chrysostom, both known for their rhetorical power. They are examined together in this Oxford University publication:

J. H. W. G. Liebeschuetz, Ambrose and John Chrysostom: Clerics between Desert and Empire (OUP, 2011), 320pp.


About this book, Oxford tells us:

J. H. W. G. Liebeschuetz compares the personalities and the respective careers of two of the greatest of the early Christian Fathers, Ambrose and John Chrysostom. While the statesmanlike Ambrose ended his life as a pillar of the Western establishment, Chrysostom, the outspoken idealist, died in exile. However, their views and ideals were remarakably similar: both bishops were concerned with the social role of the Church, both were determined opponents of what they called the Arian heresy, and each attracted a dedicated following among his urban congregation. This similarity, Liebeschuetz argues, was due not to the influence of one on the other, but was a consequence of their participation in a Christian culture which spanned the divide between the Eastern (later Byzantine) and Western parts of the Roman Empire. The monastic movement figures throughout the book as an important influence on both men and as perhaps the most dynamic development in the Christian culture of the fourth century.