About this book we are told:
First systematic study of Patmos in the reception history of the Apocalypse
Wide-ranging approach to reception history,
embracing sermons, hymns, liturgical texts, poetry, and travel books as
well as commentaries
Includes popular and marginal as well as mainstream and magisterial interpreters
Contains a chapter on the interpretation of Patmos in visual art accompanied by colour illustrations
Explores the wider implications of reception history for critical biblical scholarship
This
monograph explores the significance accorded to John's island of Patmos
(Rev. 1:9) within the wider reception history of the Apocalypse. In
contrast to the relatively scant attention paid to John's island in
modern commentaries, this reception-historical survey reveals both the
greater prominence accorded to Patmos by earlier interpreters, and the
richer diversity of readings the text has provoked. These include
interest in the physical character of Patmos and its significance as an
island; the date and reason for John's sojourn there; attempts to locate
Patmos in a geography which is sometimes more mythical than literal;
the
meaning of the name 'Patmos' in the context of a biblical book which
treats other place-names symbolically. This diversity is supported by a
close reading of Rev. 1:9, which highlights the extent to which even its
literal sense is highly ambiguous.
Ian Boxall brings together
for the first time in a coherent narrative a wide range of
interpretations of Patmos, reflecting different chronological periods,
cultural contexts, and Christian traditions. Boxall understands biblical
interpretation broadly, to include interpretations in biographical
traditions about John, sermons, liturgy, and visual art as well as
biblical commentaries.He also considers popular and marginal readings
alongside magisterial and centrist ones, and draws analogies between
similar hermeneutical
strategies across the centuries. In the final chapter Boxall explores
the wider implications of his study for biblical scholarship, advocating
an approach which encourages use of the imagination and reader
participation, and which works with a broader concept of 'meaning' than
traditional historical criticism.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Anonymous comments are never approved. Use your real name and say something intelligent.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.