It was nearly 30 years ago now when, in a small (and now, sadly, closed) Anglican parish in southern Ontario, I witnessed my maternal grandmother go to war with the parish liturgical committee as it tried to impose the 1985
Book of Alternative Services of the Anglican Church of Canada. Ever since then I have, in Anglican, Roman Catholic, Eastern Catholic, and Eastern Orthodox contexts been aware of how profoundly neuralgic liturgical and musical questions are for people--and rightly so. For contrary to all the arrogant bollocks one hears from self-important "liturgists" about how they alone have the "qualifications" and "credentials" to talk about such matters, the liturgy is, perforce, the
work of the people. And getting it right is not, contrary to the endless chatter of the current incumbent of the Roman bishoprick, a form of "rigidity" as I argued
here, quoting one of the triumvirate (the others being MacIntyre and Newman) who made me a Catholic, Stanley Hauerwas:
One reason why we Christians argue so much about which hymn to sing, which liturgy to follow, which way to worship is that the commandments teach us to believe that bad liturgy eventually leads to bad ethics. You begin by singing some sappy, sentimental hymn, then you pray some pointless prayer, and the next thing you know you have murdered your best friend.
Disputes about music and liturgy will surface afresh next spring with the publication of a collection edited by James Hawkey, Ben Quash, and Vernon White:
God’s Song and Music’s Meanings: How Shall we Sing the Lord’s Song?
About this book the publisher tells us:
The public making of music in our society happens more often in the
context of chapels, churches and cathedrals than anywhere else. The
command to sing and make music to God makes music an essential part of
the DNA of Christian worship. Taking seriously the practice and not
just the theory of music, this ground-breaking collection of essays
establishes a new standard for the interdisciplinary conversation
between theology, musicology and liturgical studies. Framed by two
substantive essays by leading theologians with a profound interest in
music, the book’s four main sections will address questions about the
history, the performance, the contexts, and the nature of music, as
Christians understand it. It will show how any serious discussion of
music opens onto considerations of time, tradition, ontology,
anthropology, providence, and the nature of God.
We are also given the contents. While some chapters obviously pertain to a Western context, the first chapter, by the patristics scholar
Carol Harrison, will obviously be of especial interest to Eastern Christians; and then the final chapter by the Orthodox theologian
David Bentley Hart will be likewise along with the response from the Anglican scholar of Orthodoxy, Rowan Williams:
Foreword
Ben Quash
Introduction: What Does ‘Musical Meaning’ Mean?
Jeremy Begbie
SECTION 1: THE MEANINGS OF MUSIC IN WESTERN HISTORY
1.
Providence and Prayer: the Theology of Music in the Patristic Church
Carol Harrison
2.
Music in the Great Chain of Being: Medieval Christianity
Emma Dillon
3.
Hearing Revelation: Music and Theology in the Reformation
Jonathan Arnold
4.
Music, Atheism and Modernity
Gareth Wilson
SECTION 2: MUSIC’S MEANING IN WORSHIP
4.
The Worship of God and the Quest of the Spirit: ‘Contemporary’ versus ‘Traditional’ Church Music
Gordon Graham
5.
The Rise of the Individual, and the Fall of Communal Participation
Anthony Ruff
SECTION 3: MUSICAL MEANING IN CHURCH AND WORLD
6.
Musical Promiscuity: the Gods Music Serves
Lucy Winkett
7.
What’s Sacred About ‘Sacred Music’?
John Butt
SECTION 4: GOD, THE COSMOS, AND THE MEANING OF MUSIC
8.
Christ the Song of God: Is Music Absolute?
Daniel Chua
9.
Sacred Music and the Holy Trinity
David Bentley Hart
CONCLUSION
Response to the Essays
Rowan Williams